Hourigan v Howard [2018] NSWLEC 1686
The photinia hedge did not severely obstruct sunlight to the applicants' living room window: any winter obstruction would be partial and also caused by the fence and more distant trees, there was no mid-summer obstruction, and the applicants provided no photos or shadow diagrams showing otherwise. Because the obstruction was not severe, the Court could not make orders interfering with the trees.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 December 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Class 2 Trees Dispute Application Under S 14 B of the Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 (nsw) / Onsite Hearing and Principal Judgment
- Outcome
- The application is dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['hedge' 'obstruction of Sunlight' 'photinia Trees' 'pruning and Maintenance Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 2 Trees Dispute Application Under S 14 B of the Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 (nsw) / Onsite Hearing and Principal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the respondents' photinia hedge severely obstructed sunlight to the applicants' living room window so as to justify orders under s 14B of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 (NSW)." 'Whether the respondents should be ordered to prune and maintain the plants at fence height.']
Ratio Decidendi
The photinia hedge did not severely obstruct sunlight to the applicants' living room window: any winter obstruction would be partial and also caused by the fence and more distant trees, there was no mid-summer obstruction, and the applicants provided no photos or shadow diagrams showing otherwise. Because the obstruction was not severe, the Court could not make orders interfering with the trees.
Court Disposition
The application is dismissed.
Orders
- ['The application is dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment