Commonwealth v Brisbane Milling Company Limited [1916] HCA 39

Commonwealth v Brisbane Milling Company Limited [1916] HCA 39

By majority, the High Court held it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the appeal or motion for a new trial after a jury verdict in a Supreme Court of a State exercising federal jurisdiction; the appellate power under s 73 of the Constitution is limited to appeals from judgments or orders of courts, not from verdicts or new trial motions, and cannot be extended by parliamentary act.

Parties
Appellant; Defendant: The Commonwealth; Respondent; Plaintiff: The Brisbane Milling Company Limited
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
13 June 1916
Procedural Posture
Appeal From a Civil Action (breach of Contract) / High Court Appeal From Verdict and Judgment of Supreme Court of New South Wales (federal Jurisdiction); Motion for New Trial or to Reduce Damages
Outcome
Appeal dismissed as incompetent
Legal Topics
High Court Appellate Jurisdiction, Motions for New Trial, Verdicts and Judgments, Breach of Contract, Damages
Constitutional Law Federal Jurisdiction Civil Procedure High Court Appellate Jurisdiction Motions for New Trial Verdicts and Judgments Breach of Contract Damages

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 29 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Commonwealth

Appellant; Defendant

The Brisbane Milling Company Limited

Respondent; Plaintiff

Procedural Posture

Appeal From a Civil Action (breach of Contract) / High Court Appeal From Verdict and Judgment of Supreme Court of New South Wales (federal Jurisdiction); Motion for New Trial or to Reduce Damages

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Does the High Court have jurisdiction to entertain an application for a new trial after a jury verdict in a Supreme Court of a State exercising federal jurisdiction?
  2. 2 Can a verdict of a jury or a motion for a new trial be appealed to the High Court under s 73 of the Constitution or under the Judiciary Act?

Ratio Decidendi

By majority, the High Court held it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the appeal or motion for a new trial after a jury verdict in a Supreme Court of a State exercising federal jurisdiction; the appellate power under s 73 of the Constitution is limited to appeals from judgments or orders of courts, not from verdicts or new trial motions, and cannot be extended by parliamentary act.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed as incompetent

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs