R v Lloyd [2012] NSWDC 184

R v Lloyd [2012] NSWDC 184

The gravity of the five historical child sexual assault offences against two young boys required a sentence of full-time imprisonment, notwithstanding the offender's long period of blameless conduct, demonstrated rehabilitation, remorse, personal and health difficulties, family circumstances, and likely more onerous custody. The court sentenced by reference to the historical sentencing regime, allowed substantial leniency for delay, applied a late guilty plea discount of about ten per cent, partially accumulated the sentences for offences involving B on those involving A, and found special circumstances.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
12 June 2012
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence for Historical Child Sexual Assault Offences / Sentencing After Guilty Plea
Outcome
Sentenced to an overall term of imprisonment consisting of a non-parole period of 18 months and a total sentence of 3 years.
Legal Topics
['historical Child Sexual Assault' 'delay in Sentencing' 'guilty Plea' 'rehabilitation' 'totality' 'special Circumstances' 'protection Custody']
['criminal Law' 'sentencing'] ['historical Child Sexual Assault' 'delay in Sentencing' 'guilty Plea' 'rehabilitation' 'totality' 'special Circumstances' 'protection Custody']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Sentence for Historical Child Sexual Assault Offences / Sentencing After Guilty Plea

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['What sentence should be imposed for five historical child sexual assault offences committed against two young complainants.' 'How the substantial delay between offending and sentence should affect sentence, including by reference to the sentencing regime and tariff at the time of offending.' "Whether the offender's demonstrated rehabilitation, remorse, health, family circumstances, and likely more onerous custody conditions warranted leniency or special circumstances." 'What level of accumulation was appropriate across offences involving two complainants.']

Ratio Decidendi

The gravity of the five historical child sexual assault offences against two young boys required a sentence of full-time imprisonment, notwithstanding the offender's long period of blameless conduct, demonstrated rehabilitation, remorse, personal and health difficulties, family circumstances, and likely more onerous custody. The court sentenced by reference to the historical sentencing regime, allowed substantial leniency for delay, applied a late guilty plea discount of about ten per cent, partially accumulated the sentences for offences involving B on those involving A, and found special circumstances.

Court Disposition

Sentenced to an overall term of imprisonment consisting of a non-parole period of 18 months and a total sentence of 3 years.

Orders

  • ['There is to be no publication of anything which would identify or tend to identify the names of the complainants.' 'For counts 1 and 2, a sentence of imprisonment of a fixed term of 18 months commencing 12 June 2012.' 'For counts 3, 4 and 5, a sentence of imprisonment with a non-parole period of 12 months and a...