R v DIAZ [2000] NSWSC 91
The psychiatric evidence of Dr Westmore and Dr Strum established that, when the accused killed her child, she was suffering from a psychotic illness, most likely paranoid schizophrenia, which deprived her of the capacity to know that what she was doing was wrong. The accused therefore proved the mental illness defence, and the only proper verdict was not guilty by reason of mental illness.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 February 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Prosecution for Murder / Trial by Judge Alone; Special Verdict on Mental Illness
- Outcome
- The accused was found not guilty of the charge by reason of mental illness.
- Legal Topics
- ['homicide' 'murder' 'mental Illness Defence' 'special Verdict' 'judge Alone Trial']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Prosecution for Murder / Trial by Judge Alone; Special Verdict on Mental Illness
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the accused was criminally responsible for killing Samuel Diaz or was not guilty by reason of mental illness.' "Whether the accused's mental illness deprived her of knowing that what she was doing was wrong." 'What order should be made following a special verdict of not guilty by reason of mental illness.']
Ratio Decidendi
The psychiatric evidence of Dr Westmore and Dr Strum established that, when the accused killed her child, she was suffering from a psychotic illness, most likely paranoid schizophrenia, which deprived her of the capacity to know that what she was doing was wrong. The accused therefore proved the mental illness defence, and the only proper verdict was not guilty by reason of mental illness.
Court Disposition
The accused was found not guilty of the charge by reason of mental illness.
Orders
- ['The accused is not guilty of the charge by reason of mental illness.' 'The accused is to be detained in a hospital until released by due process of law.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment