Alliance Engineering Pty Ltd & Anor v Yarraburn Nominees Pty Ltd & Ors [2011] NSWCA 301
Clauses 4.10 and 4.11 were not confined to liquor licences. Immediately before the transfer, Alliance's permission to keep and operate two poker machines at the hotel depended on both two poker machine entitlements allocated in respect of the hotelier's licence and authorisation from the Authority. That ongoing permission could conventionally be described as a licence of the premises for the current year. By transferring one poker machine entitlement to Ms Perry and applying for approval, Alliance applied for removal of that licence from the hotel and contravened clause 4.11; on termination it was required by clause 4.10 to do all acts necessary to transfer the licence, including the...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 September 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Concerning Construction of a Hotel Lease and Transfer of a Poker Machine Entitlement / Appeal From Decision of Ball J, [2010] NSWSC 1081
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['hotel Lease' 'poker Machine Entitlement' 'lessor Consent' 'gaming Machines Act 2001' 'construction of Licence Clauses']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal Concerning Construction of a Hotel Lease and Transfer of a Poker Machine Entitlement / Appeal From Decision of Ball J, [2010] NSWSC 1081
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether, on the true construction of the hotel lease, the assignee of the lease was entitled shortly before termination to transfer a poker machine entitlement to a third party without the lessor's consent." 'Whether a poker machine entitlement was a licence, or part of a licence or permission to keep and operate poker machines, for the purposes of clauses 4.10 and 4.11 of the lease.' "Whether the lessee's application to transfer the poker machine entitlement constituted an application for removal of a licence of the hotel."]
Ratio Decidendi
Clauses 4.10 and 4.11 were not confined to liquor licences. Immediately before the transfer, Alliance's permission to keep and operate two poker machines at the hotel depended on both two poker machine entitlements allocated in respect of the hotelier's licence and authorisation from the Authority. That ongoing permission could conventionally be described as a licence of the premises for the current year. By transferring one poker machine entitlement to Ms Perry and applying for approval, Alliance applied for removal of that licence from the hotel and contravened clause 4.11; on termination it was required by clause 4.10 to do all acts necessary to transfer the licence, including the...
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['Appeal dismissed.' 'Appellants pay the costs of the First and Second Respondents of the appeal.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment