Lake View and Star Ltd v Cominelli and Bonazzi [1937] UKPCHCA 1
Section 152 of the Mining Act 1904-1923 (W.A.) is mandatory and intended to protect tributers by requiring that not less than fifty per cent of any premium received by the owner on the sale of gold must be paid to the tributer, and any agreement purporting to waive or reduce this statutory entitlement is illegal and void; such an agreement, made as a compromise of a dispute, is rendered invalid by the statute and cannot discharge the statutory liability, either for past or prospective deliveries.
- Parties
- Appellant; Defendant: Lake View and Star Ltd.; Respondent; Plaintiff: Cominelli; Respondent; Plaintiff: Bonazzi
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 February 1937
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Appeal—judgment of Privy Council on Appeal From High Court of Australia
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Illegality of Contract, Protection of Tributers, Interpretation of Mining Act 1904 1923 (w.a.), Effect of Statutory Obligations in Contracts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lake View and Star Ltd.
Appellant; Defendant
Cominelli
Respondent; Plaintiff
Bonazzi
Respondent; Plaintiff
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Appeal—judgment of Privy Council on Appeal From High Court of Australia
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an agreement compromising a tributer's claim for 50% share of premiums, as mandated by statute, is valid in light of section 152 of the Mining Act 1904-1923 (W.A.).
- 2 Whether past payments pursuant to such an agreement can lawfully discharge liability under the tribute agreements.
Ratio Decidendi
Section 152 of the Mining Act 1904-1923 (W.A.) is mandatory and intended to protect tributers by requiring that not less than fifty per cent of any premium received by the owner on the sale of gold must be paid to the tributer, and any agreement purporting to waive or reduce this statutory entitlement is illegal and void; such an agreement, made as a compromise of a dispute, is rendered invalid by the statute and cannot discharge the statutory liability, either for past or prospective deliveries.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed.
- Appellants to pay the costs of the appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment