Horsfall v Braye [1908] HCA 85
The subject matter of the negotiations and conveyance was treated as vacant building land to be redeveloped, substantially different from that in connection with which the easement had previously been enjoyed. There was no implied grant of the lane as an easement under the general words. The circumstances and conduct showed no intention that the easement should continue, and, even if the words of the conveyance might include it, this would be inconsistent with the real agreement and subject to rectification. Oral declarations of intention by the vendor were admissible only as surrounding circumstances to ascertain intention, not to vary express words. The purchasers' case fails both as to...
- Parties
- Appellant; Defendant: Horsfall; Respondents; Plaintiffs: Braye and another
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 December 1908
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / High Court Appeal From the Supreme Court of New South Wales, Equity Division
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Implied Grant of Easements, Rectification of Conveyances, Vendor and Purchaser, Construction of General Words in Conveyances, Surrounding Circumstances in Contract Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Horsfall
Appellant; Defendant
Braye and another
Respondents; Plaintiffs
Procedural Posture
Appeal / High Court Appeal From the Supreme Court of New South Wales, Equity Division
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an easement (right of way) over a lane was granted expressly or by implication to the purchasers by the conveyance of land forming part of a larger block.
- 2 Whether surrounding circumstances and the parties' intentions may affect the construction of the general words in the conveyance.
- 3 Whether oral declarations of intention by the vendor may be considered in the construction or for rectification of the conveyance.
Ratio Decidendi
The subject matter of the negotiations and conveyance was treated as vacant building land to be redeveloped, substantially different from that in connection with which the easement had previously been enjoyed. There was no implied grant of the lane as an easement under the general words. The circumstances and conduct showed no intention that the easement should continue, and, even if the words of the conveyance might include it, this would be inconsistent with the real agreement and subject to rectification. Oral declarations of intention by the vendor were admissible only as surrounding circumstances to ascertain intention, not to vary express words. The purchasers' case fails both as to...
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Plaintiffs' suit dismissed
- No rectification of the conveyance deemed necessary
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment