McCann, in the matter of Walton Construction Pty Ltd (In Liquidation) v Walton [2020] FCA 223
The Court granted release because there was a very significant overlap and inter-relationship between the material facts and circumstances in QUD 573 of 2019 and the factual matrix in QUD 674 of 2016, commonality of parties and issues, and no objection or positive support from the relevant defendants other than Mr Walton, whose interests the Court considered. Those matters provided good reason and made the interests of justice determinative in favour of release from the implied undertaking.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 February 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Corporations Interlocutory Application by Liquidators for Release From an Implied Undertaking / Ex Tempore Reasons and Orders on Application to Use Documents From QUD 674 of 2016 in QUD 573 of 2019 and for Timetabling Orders
- Outcome
- Application granted; plaintiffs released from the implied undertaking to the extent necessary, timetabling orders varied, liberty to apply, and costs reserved.
- Legal Topics
- ['implied Undertaking' 'release From Undertaking' 'use of Documents From Another Proceeding' "directors' Duties" 'case Management and Timetabling']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Corporations Interlocutory Application by Liquidators for Release From an Implied Undertaking / Ex Tempore Reasons and Orders on Application to Use Documents From QUD 674 of 2016 in QUD 573 of 2019 and for Timetabling Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the plaintiffs should be released from the implied undertaking to permit use in the present proceeding of the affidavit of Patrick Joseph McCurry sworn 8 May 2018 and specified exhibits filed and read in QUD 674 of 2016.' 'Whether special circumstances or good reason existed to release the plaintiffs from the undertaking having regard to overlap between proceedings, commonality of parties, issues and legal representation, and the interests of justice.' 'Whether existing timetabling orders should be varied.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court granted release because there was a very significant overlap and inter-relationship between the material facts and circumstances in QUD 573 of 2019 and the factual matrix in QUD 674 of 2016, commonality of parties and issues, and no objection or positive support from the relevant defendants other than Mr Walton, whose interests the Court considered. Those matters provided good reason and made the interests of justice determinative in favour of release from the implied undertaking.
Court Disposition
Application granted; plaintiffs released from the implied undertaking to the extent necessary, timetabling orders varied, liberty to apply, and costs reserved.
Orders
- ['The plaintiffs be released from the implied undertaking to the extent necessary to permit the plaintiffs to use in the present proceedings the affidavit of Patrick Joseph McCurry of 8 May 2018 filed and read in QUD 674 of 2016, including exhibits PJM-2, PJM-4, PJM-6, PJM-7, PJM-8, PJM-9, PJM-10, PJM-11, PJM-12,...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment