R v Dennis ESTEVEZ [2017] NSWDC 433
The offence was a very serious Commonwealth drug importation offence, slightly below the midrange of objective seriousness for offences under s 307.1(1), because the offender imported just over the commercial quantity threshold but did so as a trusted courier with specific knowledge, prior planning and expected financial reward. Although his subjective case was relatively good and he was allowed a total discount of about 30% to 35% for the early guilty plea and assistance, the need for general deterrence, denunciation and punishment required a substantial custodial sentence of 9 years with a 6 year non-parole period.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 October 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentence for Importing a Commercial Quantity of a Border Controlled Drug / Sentencing After Plea of Guilty in the Local Court
- Outcome
- Offender convicted and sentenced to imprisonment for 9 years with a non-parole period of 6 years.
- Legal Topics
- ['import Commercial Quantity of Border Controlled Drug' 'cocaine Importation' 'objective Seriousness' 'general Deterrence' 'early Plea of Guilty' 'assistance to Authorities' 'non Parole Period']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence for Importing a Commercial Quantity of a Border Controlled Drug / Sentencing After Plea of Guilty in the Local Court
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What sentence should be imposed for importing 2,539.3 grams of pure cocaine into Australia contrary to s 307.1(1) of the Criminal Code 1995.' "How the offender's role as a courier with specific knowledge, the quantity and value of cocaine, financial reward, drug debt, guilty plea, assistance to authorities, remorse, age, background and prospects of rehabilitation affected sentence." 'What discount should be allowed for the early guilty plea and assistance to authorities.']
Ratio Decidendi
The offence was a very serious Commonwealth drug importation offence, slightly below the midrange of objective seriousness for offences under s 307.1(1), because the offender imported just over the commercial quantity threshold but did so as a trusted courier with specific knowledge, prior planning and expected financial reward. Although his subjective case was relatively good and he was allowed a total discount of about 30% to 35% for the early guilty plea and assistance, the need for general deterrence, denunciation and punishment required a substantial custodial sentence of 9 years with a 6 year non-parole period.
Court Disposition
Offender convicted and sentenced to imprisonment for 9 years with a non-parole period of 6 years.
Orders
- ['The offender is convicted.' 'He is sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 9 years commencing 10 November 2016, expiring 9 November 2025 with a non-parole period of 6 years commencing 10 November 2016, expiring 9 November 2022.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment