R (Commonwealth) v Wilson [2018] NSWDC 518

R (Commonwealth) v Wilson [2018] NSWDC 518

The offender's conduct was objectively very serious because over about 18 months he participated as an autonomous member of an international drug importation and distribution network, importing quantities well above the commercial threshold and trafficking marketable quantities of cocaine and methamphetamine for financial gain. His positive personal history, remorse and references did not explain or materially reduce the seriousness of the offending. After allowing a total 35% discount for early guilty pleas and assistance to authorities, and allowing concurrency, the appropriate effective head sentence was 9 years with a non-parole period of 6 years.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
19 October 2018
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence / Sentence Following Guilty Pleas to Three Commonwealth Criminal Code Charges
Outcome
Offender convicted on all three charges and sentenced to an effective head sentence of 9 years imprisonment with one non-parole period of 6 years.
Legal Topics
['importing a Commercial Quantity of a Border Controlled Drug' 'attempting to Possess a Commercial Quantity of a Border Controlled Drug' 'trafficking a Marketable Quantity of Controlled Drugs' 'methamphetamine' 'cocaine' 'guilty Plea Discount' 'assistance to Authorities' 'non Parole Period']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Sentence / Sentence Following Guilty Pleas to Three Commonwealth Criminal Code Charges

  1. 1 ['What sentences should be imposed for importing a commercial quantity of methamphetamine, attempting to possess a commercial quantity of methamphetamine, and trafficking marketable quantities of cocaine and methamphetamine.' "How to assess the offender's role within the criminal syndicate and the objective seriousness of the offences." 'What discount should be allowed for early guilty pleas and assistance to authorities.' 'What total effective sentence and non-parole period should be fixed, allowing for concurrency.']

Ratio Decidendi

The offender's conduct was objectively very serious because over about 18 months he participated as an autonomous member of an international drug importation and distribution network, importing quantities well above the commercial threshold and trafficking marketable quantities of cocaine and methamphetamine for financial gain. His positive personal history, remorse and references did not explain or materially reduce the seriousness of the offending. After allowing a total 35% discount for early guilty pleas and assistance to authorities, and allowing concurrency, the appropriate effective head sentence was 9 years with a non-parole period of 6 years.

Court Disposition

Offender convicted on all three charges and sentenced to an effective head sentence of 9 years imprisonment with one non-parole period of 6 years.

Orders

  • ['On the charge that between 20 January 2016 and 25 March 2016 the offender trafficked a marketable quantity of border controlled drugs namely cocaine and methamphetamine, he was convicted and sentenced to imprisonment for 2 years and 8 months commencing on 26 May 2016 and expiring on 25 January 2019.' 'On the...