Regina v K [2000] NSWCCA 200
The sentencing judge erred by adopting an eleven-year starting point for a courier importing a mid-range trafficable quantity of heroin. After the allowance required by s 16G of the Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), the correct head sentence before any discount was eight years. A discount of approximately, but not quite, forty percent for the applicant's substantial assistance was appropriate, reducing the head sentence to five years, with a non-parole period of three years; any lesser sentence would not sufficiently reflect the objective criminality of the offence.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 May 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal Against Sentence / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence and Appeal in the Court of Criminal Appeal
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal against sentence granted; appeal allowed; sentence quashed; applicant resentenced.
- Legal Topics
- ['importing Heroin' 'trafficable Quantity' 'courier Sentencing' 'discount for Assistance' 'non Parole Period' 'protective Custody']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal Against Sentence / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence and Appeal in the Court of Criminal Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the sentence of seven years' imprisonment with a non-parole period of four years for importing a trafficable quantity of heroin was manifestly excessive or outside the permissible range." 'Whether the sentencing judge used an excessive starting point of eleven years before applying the discount for assistance.' "What discount and non-parole period were appropriate having regard to the applicant's assistance, plea, subjective circumstances, protective custody and s 16G of the Crimes Act 1914 (Cth)."]
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge erred by adopting an eleven-year starting point for a courier importing a mid-range trafficable quantity of heroin. After the allowance required by s 16G of the Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), the correct head sentence before any discount was eight years. A discount of approximately, but not quite, forty percent for the applicant's substantial assistance was appropriate, reducing the head sentence to five years, with a non-parole period of three years; any lesser sentence would not sufficiently reflect the objective criminality of the offence.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal against sentence granted; appeal allowed; sentence quashed; applicant resentenced.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal against sentence granted.' 'Appeal allowed.' 'Sentence quashed.' 'In lieu of the sentence imposed, the applicant is sentenced to imprisonment for five years commencing on 29 November 1998 with a non-parole period of three years commencing on the same day.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment