Regina (Commonwealth) v Virginia Jabreal [2007] NSWDC 361

Regina (Commonwealth) v Virginia Jabreal [2007] NSWDC 361

The offending involved a not insignificant $60,097.35 social security overpayment over about seven years and, consistently with authority, required a custodial sentence. The sentence was reduced to an overall 18 months because the offending was driven by need rather than greed, the offender voluntarily ceased and substantially disclosed the offending, pleaded guilty, co-operated, had begun repayment, had no prior convictions, and was facing her first imprisonment. Because of her age, clean record and first sentence of imprisonment, the custodial sentence was ordered to be served by periodic detention, with release after six months on recognizance.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
25 October 2007
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentencing for Commonwealth Social Security Fraud Offences / Sentence After Guilty Plea
Outcome
Overall sentence of 18 months imprisonment to be served by periodic detention, with release after serving six months upon recognizance and a 12 month good behaviour condition; reparation and fingerprint orders also made.
Legal Topics
['imposition on the Commonwealth' 'dishonesty Causing Loss to a Commonwealth Entity' 'voluntary Cessation of Criminal Activity' 'need Rather Than Greed' 'periodic Detention' 'recognizance Release Order' 'reparation']
['criminal Law' 'sentencing' 'commonwealth Offences' 'social Security Fraud'] ['imposition on the Commonwealth' 'dishonesty Causing Loss to a Commonwealth Entity' 'voluntary Cessation of Criminal Activity' 'need Rather Than Greed' 'periodic Detention' 'recognizance Release Order' 'reparation']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Sentencing for Commonwealth Social Security Fraud Offences / Sentence After Guilty Plea

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the offender's social security fraud required a custodial sentence." "What weight should be given to the offender's voluntary cessation and disclosure of offending to the Commonwealth Services Delivery Agency." 'Whether the offending was driven by need rather than greed and how that affected the sentence length.' 'Whether the sentence should be served by way of periodic detention.' 'What recognizance release order and ancillary orders should be made for the Commonwealth offences.']

Ratio Decidendi

The offending involved a not insignificant $60,097.35 social security overpayment over about seven years and, consistently with authority, required a custodial sentence. The sentence was reduced to an overall 18 months because the offending was driven by need rather than greed, the offender voluntarily ceased and substantially disclosed the offending, pleaded guilty, co-operated, had begun repayment, had no prior convictions, and was facing her first imprisonment. Because of her age, clean record and first sentence of imprisonment, the custodial sentence was ordered to be served by periodic detention, with release after six months on recognizance.

Court Disposition

Overall sentence of 18 months imprisonment to be served by periodic detention, with release after serving six months upon recognizance and a 12 month good behaviour condition; reparation and fingerprint orders also made.

Orders

  • ['For each of three offences of dishonestly causing a loss to a Commonwealth entity contrary to s135.1 of the Criminal Code 1995, the offender was sentenced to four months imprisonment, cumulatively, from 3 November 2007 to 2 November 2008.' 'For each of three offences of imposition on the Commonwealth contrary to...