SOMOSI v JOHN FAIRFAX PUBLICATIONS PTY LTD [2004] NSWCA 176
The publication complained of was not capable of carrying any of the imputations so framed by the claimant, as assessed from the perspective of the ordinary reasonable reader.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 June 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Leave to Appeal Refused
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal refused with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['imputation in Defamation' 'capacity of Publication to Convey Imputation' 'interpretation by Ordinary Reasonable Reader' 'leave to Amend Statement of Claim']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Leave to Appeal Refused
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether publication was capable of carrying the imputations as framed by the claimant' 'Whether the ordinary reader would interpret the article in the manner alleged by the claimant' 'Leave to amend statement of claim']
Ratio Decidendi
The publication complained of was not capable of carrying any of the imputations so framed by the claimant, as assessed from the perspective of the ordinary reasonable reader.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal refused with costs.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal refused with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment