Whelan & Anor v John Fairfax Publications Limited & 2 Ors [2000] NSWSC 816
The considerations applied by Dunford J and the Drummoyne principle require the pleaded imputations to specify the nature of the alleged corrupt conduct; as the amended imputations still lacked particularity, they were struck out with leave to replead.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 August 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Defamation / Interlocutory Application to Strike Out Pleadings
- Outcome
- Imputations 6(d) and 8(f) struck out with leave to replead; costs to defendants; matter listed for further argument.
- Legal Topics
- ['imputations' 'pleading' 'corrupt Conduct' 'independent Commission Against Corruption']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Defamation / Interlocutory Application to Strike Out Pleadings
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether pleadings of imputations concerning 'corrupt conduct' are sufficiently specific" 'Whether certain pleaded imputations should be struck out for lack of particularity']
Ratio Decidendi
The considerations applied by Dunford J and the Drummoyne principle require the pleaded imputations to specify the nature of the alleged corrupt conduct; as the amended imputations still lacked particularity, they were struck out with leave to replead.
Court Disposition
Imputations 6(d) and 8(f) struck out with leave to replead; costs to defendants; matter listed for further argument.
Orders
- ['Imputations 6(d) and 8(f) struck out with leave to replead.' 'Leave to replead to be exercised by 1 September 2000.' 'Written outlines of submissions on any dispute about repleading to be exchanged by 11 October 2000.' "Plaintiffs to pay defendants' costs." 'Matter listed for argument in the Defamation List on 13...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment