Assaf & Anor v Skalkos & Anor [1999] NSWSC 458
The matters complained of are capable of conveying the imputations pleaded in the Second Further Amended Statement of Claim; each imputation is capable of being defamatory and thus should go to the jury.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 May 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Defamation / Interlocutory Application Regarding Capacity of Imputations to Be Defamatory
- Outcome
- Orders made; relevant imputations to go to the jury; previous orders confirmed; liberty to restore granted; costs of directions hearing to be costs in the cause.
- Legal Topics
- ['imputations' 'capacity to Defame' 'directions to Jury']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Defamation / Interlocutory Application Regarding Capacity of Imputations to Be Defamatory
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the matters complained of are capable of conveying the imputations pleaded' 'Whether each imputation is capable of being defamatory']
Ratio Decidendi
The matters complained of are capable of conveying the imputations pleaded in the Second Further Amended Statement of Claim; each imputation is capable of being defamatory and thus should go to the jury.
Court Disposition
Orders made; relevant imputations to go to the jury; previous orders confirmed; liberty to restore granted; costs of directions hearing to be costs in the cause.
Orders
- ['Imputation 7(a), (c), (d), (e); 7A(a), (c), (d), (e); 8(a), (c), (d); 8A(a), (c), (d) will go to the jury.' 'Orders 5, 6 and 7 made in the judgment of 30 April 1999 confirmed and matter to be expedited.' 'Liberty to restore to the Defamation List on 7 days notice.' 'Costs of the directions hearing on 14 May 1999...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment