Ingham v ACN 000 333 844 Ltd (In Liq) (formerly known as Australian Casualty & Life Ltd) & Ors [2006] NSWCA 63
The term 'disorder' as used in the policy and its special conditions includes a condition resulting from traumatic injury, such as the one suffered by Mr Ingham. Therefore, the special condition limiting benefits applies to his disability, and there is no ambiguity warranting the application of the contra proferentem principle.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 April 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- ['income Protection Policy' 'policy Construction' 'special Condition' 'disability' 'disease or Disorder']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether 'disorder' in the policy includes a condition resulting from traumatic injury" 'Whether the special condition limits benefits for disability caused by such injury' 'Whether the contra proferentem principle applies']
Ratio Decidendi
The term 'disorder' as used in the policy and its special conditions includes a condition resulting from traumatic injury, such as the one suffered by Mr Ingham. Therefore, the special condition limiting benefits applies to his disability, and there is no ambiguity warranting the application of the contra proferentem principle.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal refused
Orders
- ["Claimant ordered to pay the insurer's costs"]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment