Commissioner for Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia v. Lutovi Investments Pty Ltd [1978] FCA 53
To constitute a share as 'redeemable' under s.44(2D)(b), there must be an agreement or arrangement between two or more persons with the relevant purpose of enabling the company, by means including reduction in capital, to pay money to shareholders. On the facts, the issuance of bonus shares from the assets revaluation reserve did not occur pursuant to such an arrangement and did not enable the return of capital, as the company possessed independent power and surplus funds to effect the reduction in capital. Thus, the bonus shares could not be regarded as redeemable under the statutory definition, and the taxpayer was entitled to exclude the value of such shares from assessable income.
- Parties
- Appellant (respondent): THE COMMISSIONER FOR TAXATION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA; Respondent (appellant): LUTOVI INVESTMENTS PTY. LIMITED
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 July 1978
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / On Appeal From the Supreme Court of New South Wales Administrative Law Division
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Income Tax, Dividends, Bonus Shares, Asset Revaluation Reserve, Reduction of Capital, Arrangement Under S.44(2 D)(b) Income Tax Assessment Act 1936
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
THE COMMISSIONER FOR TAXATION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
Appellant (respondent)
LUTOVI INVESTMENTS PTY. LIMITED
Respondent (appellant)
Procedural Posture
Appeal / On Appeal From the Supreme Court of New South Wales Administrative Law Division
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 1,269,336 bonus shares issued to Lutovi Investments Pty. Limited by I.C.D. Limited as fully paid up shares by application of a portion of the assets revaluation reserve are redeemable shares within the meaning of s.44(2)(b)(iii) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936, as affected by s.44(2D)(b).
- 2 Whether there was an 'agreement or arrangement' to which s.44(2D)(b) applies, and whether such arrangement had the purpose of enabling the payment of money by means of a reduction in capital to the shareholders.
Ratio Decidendi
To constitute a share as 'redeemable' under s.44(2D)(b), there must be an agreement or arrangement between two or more persons with the relevant purpose of enabling the company, by means including reduction in capital, to pay money to shareholders. On the facts, the issuance of bonus shares from the assets revaluation reserve did not occur pursuant to such an arrangement and did not enable the return of capital, as the company possessed independent power and surplus funds to effect the reduction in capital. Thus, the bonus shares could not be regarded as redeemable under the statutory definition, and the taxpayer was entitled to exclude the value of such shares from assessable income.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment