Jobnet v Copeman [1999] NSWSC 848
Jobnet Employment Services Incorporated was incorporated under s8(1) of the Associations Incorporation Act 1984, and the members of the management committee of Western Sydney at incorporation became the members and committee of Jobnet. Purported meetings on 19 May 1998 and 11 May 1999 were invalid and of no effect. Only Bevinetto, Chandler, and McGowan are current committee members; recent membership appointments and meeting outcomes are invalid.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 August 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Declaratory Relief / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Declarations granted as per paragraph 30; court will hear further submissions on costs and possible orders to regularise association affairs.
- Legal Topics
- ['incorporated Associations' 'committee Membership' 'validity of General Meetings']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Declaratory Relief / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Jobnet was incorporated as an existing association or a new association under the Associations Incorporation Act 1984' 'Who are the valid members and committee of Jobnet Employment Services Incorporated' 'Validity of meetings held on 19 May 1998 and 11 May 1999']
Ratio Decidendi
Jobnet Employment Services Incorporated was incorporated under s8(1) of the Associations Incorporation Act 1984, and the members of the management committee of Western Sydney at incorporation became the members and committee of Jobnet. Purported meetings on 19 May 1998 and 11 May 1999 were invalid and of no effect. Only Bevinetto, Chandler, and McGowan are current committee members; recent membership appointments and meeting outcomes are invalid.
Court Disposition
Declarations granted as per paragraph 30; court will hear further submissions on costs and possible orders to regularise association affairs.
Orders
- ['Declare Silvano Bevinetto is a member of the committee of the first plaintiff and Blunden and Twemlow are not members of the committee.' 'Declare the first, fourth, fifth, sixth, eighth, and ninth defendants are not members of the committee of the first plaintiff.' 'Declare the first defendant and second defendant...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment