Rana v Survery (No 2) [2012] NSWSC 905
No valid decision under the model rules was made at either the 21 November 2008 meeting or the 16 July 2010 meeting to admit the contested new members; and on the evidence, no valid resolution was made to admit the 22 or 39 persons contended for by the parties. Section 1322 of the Corporations Act does not cure the lack of a valid substantive decision under the Associations Incorporation Act 1984. The decision of the Executive Council of 26 April 2012 concerning School Board appointments was valid, as the earlier appointments were for a two-year term from May 2010 and the evidence did not support the plaintiffs' alternate timeline.
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Wajahat Ali Khan Rana; Second Plaintiff: Mohammad Abdul Sami; Third Plaintiff: Rab Nawaz; Fourth Plaintiff: Abdul Rehman; First Defendant: Hafizur Rahman Khan Survery; Second Defendant: Masud Cheema; Third Defendant: Islamic Association Western Suburbs Sydney Inc; Fourth Defendant: Australian Islamic College of Sydney
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 August 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Principal Judgment
- Outcome
- Plaintiffs' and defendants' claims for addition of new members at meetings of 21 November 2008 and 16 July 2010 are rejected. Plaintiffs' claim to invalidate the 26 April 2012 Executive Council resolution is rejected. Plaintiffs to pay 75% of defendants’ costs.
- Legal Topics
- Incorporated Associations, Model Rules Inclusion, Membership Nomination and Approval, Procedural Irregularity, Corporate Governance, Meetings of Incorporated Associations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Wajahat Ali Khan Rana
First Plaintiff
Mohammad Abdul Sami
Second Plaintiff
Rab Nawaz
Third Plaintiff
Abdul Rehman
Fourth Plaintiff
Hafizur Rahman Khan Survery
First Defendant
Masud Cheema
Second Defendant
Islamic Association Western Suburbs Sydney Inc
Third Defendant
Australian Islamic College of Sydney
Fourth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Principal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether 183 new members were lawfully admitted at the meeting of 21 November 2008 under the Association's Constitution and governing Act
- 2 Whether 22 or 39 individuals were validly admitted as members at the Executive Council meeting of 16 July 2010
- 3 Whether procedural irregularity provisions in s 1322 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) validate actions under Associations Incorporation Act 1984
Ratio Decidendi
No valid decision under the model rules was made at either the 21 November 2008 meeting or the 16 July 2010 meeting to admit the contested new members; and on the evidence, no valid resolution was made to admit the 22 or 39 persons contended for by the parties. Section 1322 of the Corporations Act does not cure the lack of a valid substantive decision under the Associations Incorporation Act 1984. The decision of the Executive Council of 26 April 2012 concerning School Board appointments was valid, as the earlier appointments were for a two-year term from May 2010 and the evidence did not support the plaintiffs' alternate timeline.
Court Disposition
Plaintiffs' and defendants' claims for addition of new members at meetings of 21 November 2008 and 16 July 2010 are rejected. Plaintiffs' claim to invalidate the 26 April 2012 Executive Council resolution is rejected. Plaintiffs to pay 75% of defendants’ costs.
Orders
- Plaintiffs' and defendants' claims for addition of new members at meetings of 21 November 2008 and 16 July 2010 rejected.
- Plaintiffs' claim to invalidate Executive Council resolution of 26 April 2012 rejected.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment