R v MURRIN [2008] NSWDC 192

R v MURRIN [2008] NSWDC 192

For sentencing purposes, the offences were individually low to mid-level in objective criminality but cumulatively serious because there were 17 offences against eight child victims and because they involved breach of trust by a person in authority. The offender's moral culpability was significantly reduced by his youth at the time, his history of emotional deprivation and sexual abuse, and his limited appreciation of the wrongfulness and consequences of his conduct. His voluntary return to Australia, early guilty pleas, remorse, treatment and low assessed risk of reoffending were important mitigating factors, including a 25% discount for the pleas.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
10 March 2008
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentencing for Indecent Assault Offences / Sentence After Guilty Pleas
Legal Topics
['indecent Assault' 'child Sexual Assault' 'sexual Offences' 'breach of Trust' 'guilty Plea Discount' 'remorse' 'rehabilitation' 'delay in Prosecution']
['criminal Law' 'sentencing'] ['indecent Assault' 'child Sexual Assault' 'sexual Offences' 'breach of Trust' 'guilty Plea Discount' 'remorse' 'rehabilitation' 'delay in Prosecution']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Sentencing for Indecent Assault Offences / Sentence After Guilty Pleas

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['How to assess the seriousness of 17 offences of indecent assault contrary to s. 81 of the Crimes Act 1900 committed against primary school pupils in 1974.' "How the offender's guilty pleas, voluntary return to Australia, remorse and apology affected sentence." 'How delay in complaint and prosecution affected the sentencing assessment, particularly rehabilitation.' "How the offender's youth, personal history of abuse and lack of training or supervision affected moral culpability." 'How the breach of trust by a trainee brother and junior teacher affected objective seriousness.']

Ratio Decidendi

For sentencing purposes, the offences were individually low to mid-level in objective criminality but cumulatively serious because there were 17 offences against eight child victims and because they involved breach of trust by a person in authority. The offender's moral culpability was significantly reduced by his youth at the time, his history of emotional deprivation and sexual abuse, and his limited appreciation of the wrongfulness and consequences of his conduct. His voluntary return to Australia, early guilty pleas, remorse, treatment and low assessed risk of reoffending were important mitigating factors, including a 25% discount for the pleas.

Court Disposition

Orders

  • []