R v JH [2016] NSWDC 351
The Court accepted the complainant as an impressive and careful witness, found no reasonable possibility that she was mistaken about the open-mouth kisses to her neck and shoulders or the accused pressing his erect penis against her, and held that her prompt complaints, distress, the tight embrace, deep breathing and make-up on the accused's shirt supported her account. The Crown proved beyond reasonable doubt that the accused deliberately touched the complainant in the alleged way, that she did not consent, that the touching was indecent, and that the accused knew she was not consenting.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 December 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Proceeding for Indecent Assault / Judge Alone Trial Verdict
- Outcome
- The accused was found guilty of the single count on the indictment.
- Legal Topics
- ['indecent Assault' 'judge Alone Trial' 'burden and Standard of Proof' 'consent' 'credibility and Reliability of Complainant Evidence' "accused's Silence"]
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Proceeding for Indecent Assault / Judge Alone Trial Verdict
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Crown proved beyond reasonable doubt that the accused deliberately touched the complainant by kissing her with an open mouth on her neck and shoulders while pressing his erect penis against her.' 'Whether the complainant did not consent to that touching.' 'Whether the touching was indecent according to ordinary community standards.' 'Whether the accused knew that the complainant was not consenting to being touched in that way.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court accepted the complainant as an impressive and careful witness, found no reasonable possibility that she was mistaken about the open-mouth kisses to her neck and shoulders or the accused pressing his erect penis against her, and held that her prompt complaints, distress, the tight embrace, deep breathing and make-up on the accused's shirt supported her account. The Crown proved beyond reasonable doubt that the accused deliberately touched the complainant in the alleged way, that she did not consent, that the touching was indecent, and that the accused knew she was not consenting.
Court Disposition
The accused was found guilty of the single count on the indictment.
Orders
- ['The accused is found guilty of the charge on the indictment.' 'There is to be no publication of the name of the complainant or of any material which may tend to identify the complainant.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment