BHCP Pty LTD (ATF BHCP Trust) v Reliable Constructions (Australia) Pty Limited ACN 137 300 219 & Ors (2) [2020] NSWDC 508
It was not unreasonable for the cross-claimants to reject either Calderbank offer as neither represented a meaningful compromise in the context of the litigation and the stage at which the offers were made. The evidence did not justify or enable a fair lump sum assessment of costs.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 September 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Post Trial (costs Determination After Delivery of Judgment)
- Outcome
- Cross-claimants ordered to pay the third to sixth cross-defendants' costs except for costs relating to the cross-defendants' own costs applications; third to sixth cross-defendants to pay cross-claimants' costs on the applications relating to costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['indemnity Costs' 'calderbank Offers' 'lump Sum Assessment of Costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Post Trial (costs Determination After Delivery of Judgment)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether it was reasonable for the cross-claimants to reject the Calderbank offers made by the cross-defendants.' 'Whether awarding a lump sum assessment of costs is appropriate.']
Ratio Decidendi
It was not unreasonable for the cross-claimants to reject either Calderbank offer as neither represented a meaningful compromise in the context of the litigation and the stage at which the offers were made. The evidence did not justify or enable a fair lump sum assessment of costs.
Court Disposition
Cross-claimants ordered to pay the third to sixth cross-defendants' costs except for costs relating to the cross-defendants' own costs applications; third to sixth cross-defendants to pay cross-claimants' costs on the applications relating to costs.
Orders
- ["The cross-claimants pay the third to sixth cross-defendants' costs, other than in relation to the third to sixth cross-defendants' applications in regards to costs." "The third to sixth cross-defendants pay the cross-claimants' costs in relation to their applications in relation to costs."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment