Baan Australia Pty Ltd v George Weston Foods Ltd [2000] NSWSC 742
There was no evidence that GWF or its legal representatives acted improperly or vexatiously in maintaining the representations case; the case collapsed during the hearing without special circumstances warranting indemnity costs. An award of indemnity costs was therefore not justified.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 July 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Indemnity Costs / Post Judgment Costs Determination
- Outcome
- Application for indemnity costs refused
- Legal Topics
- ['indemnity Costs' 'withdrawal of Claim' 'costs Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Indemnity Costs / Post Judgment Costs Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether indemnity costs should be awarded where a party abandons part of its case during the hearing']
Ratio Decidendi
There was no evidence that GWF or its legal representatives acted improperly or vexatiously in maintaining the representations case; the case collapsed during the hearing without special circumstances warranting indemnity costs. An award of indemnity costs was therefore not justified.
Court Disposition
Application for indemnity costs refused
Orders
- ['Order 3 in the Notice of Motion refused']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment