Marks, Michael & Ors v GIO Australia Holdings Ltd & Ors [1996] FCA 414
Respondents' refusal of a reasonable settlement offer on 7 February 1995 was imprudent and warrants indemnity costs from that date onward; up to that date, costs to applicants on party and party basis as successful parties.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 May 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Group/class Action / Post Judgment (costs Determination)
- Outcome
- Costs awarded to applicants; respondent's application for costs dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['indemnity Costs' 'party and Party Costs' 'representative Proceedings' 'misleading and Deceptive Conduct' 'settlement Negotiations' 'federal Court Discretion']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Group/class Action / Post Judgment (costs Determination)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicants are entitled to indemnity costs' 'Whether respondents should recover costs for amendments and procedural steps' 'Admissibility of without prejudice settlement communications for costs determination' 'Effect of representative action provisions on costs']
Ratio Decidendi
Respondents' refusal of a reasonable settlement offer on 7 February 1995 was imprudent and warrants indemnity costs from that date onward; up to that date, costs to applicants on party and party basis as successful parties.
Court Disposition
Costs awarded to applicants; respondent's application for costs dismissed.
Orders
- ["Respondents to pay applicants' costs, including reserved costs, up to 7 February 1995 on a party and party basis." "Respondents to pay applicants' costs, including reserved costs, after 7 February 1995 on an indemnity basis."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment