Duffy & 2 Ors v Duffy & Anor [1999] NSWSC 63
The circumstances warranted departure from the usual party/party costs order because the first defendant unreasonably obstructed the sale, refused to vacate, failed to proceed after two opportunities to buy the property, had legal advice when proceedings were commenced, adopted an unrealistic stance, and caused delay in administration of the estate by the plaintiffs as trustees.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 February 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Common Law Division Application for Indemnity Costs / After Judgment Striking Out the First Defendant's Defence and Entering Judgment for Possession
- Outcome
- The plaintiffs' application for indemnity costs against the first defendant was granted.
- Legal Topics
- ['indemnity Costs' 'possession of Land' 'administration of Estate' 'obstruction of Sale']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Common Law Division Application for Indemnity Costs / After Judgment Striking Out the First Defendant's Defence and Entering Judgment for Possession
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the first defendant should pay the plaintiffs' costs on an indemnity basis rather than on the usual party/party basis."]
Ratio Decidendi
The circumstances warranted departure from the usual party/party costs order because the first defendant unreasonably obstructed the sale, refused to vacate, failed to proceed after two opportunities to buy the property, had legal advice when proceedings were commenced, adopted an unrealistic stance, and caused delay in administration of the estate by the plaintiffs as trustees.
Court Disposition
The plaintiffs' application for indemnity costs against the first defendant was granted.
Orders
- ["The first defendant is to pay the plaintiffs' costs on an indemnity basis, including the costs of today."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment