R v Kevin Gall; R v Bruce Gall (No 4) [2012] NSWSC 1355
The Crimes Act 1900 and the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 did not exclude the common law principle that a lesser included offence may be left to the jury where its elements are included in, and alleged expressly or by necessary implication by, the greater offence charged. Accessory after the fact to manslaughter is a lesser offence included in accessory after the fact to murder, and it was therefore available as an alternative verdict despite not being separately pleaded.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 September 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Common Law Criminal / Procedural Ruling at the Close of Bruce Gall's Case on Whether an Alternative Verdict Should Be Left to the Jury
- Outcome
- Bruce Gall's submission was rejected.
- Legal Topics
- ['indictment' 'alternative Verdict' 'accessory After the Fact' 'murder' 'manslaughter']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Common Law Criminal / Procedural Ruling at the Close of Bruce Gall's Case on Whether an Alternative Verdict Should Be Left to the Jury
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the form of the indictment charging Bruce Gall as accessory after the fact to murder excluded an alternative verdict of accessory after the fact to manslaughter.' 'Whether s 349 of the Crimes Act 1900 excluded the availability of an alternative verdict of accessory after the fact to manslaughter.' 'Whether the jury should be instructed that an alternative verdict of accessory after the fact to manslaughter is available if Kevin Gall is convicted of manslaughter.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Crimes Act 1900 and the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 did not exclude the common law principle that a lesser included offence may be left to the jury where its elements are included in, and alleged expressly or by necessary implication by, the greater offence charged. Accessory after the fact to manslaughter is a lesser offence included in accessory after the fact to murder, and it was therefore available as an alternative verdict despite not being separately pleaded.
Court Disposition
Bruce Gall's submission was rejected.
Orders
- ['Reject the submission that the jury ought not be instructed that an alternative verdict of accessory after the fact to manslaughter is available in respect of Bruce Gall in the event that Kevin Gall is convicted of manslaughter.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment