SafeWork NSW v Visscher (No 3); Visscher v SafeWork NSW (No 2) [2021] NSWIRComm 1099
As at 7 December 2020, Mr Visscher's site was properly regarded as a 'workplace' under s 8 of the WHS Act, enlivening the Commission's jurisdiction and permitting the issuance of a prohibition notice under s 195. Public interest immunity attaches to documents capable of disclosing the identity of informants, and the Commissioner erred in ordering production of unredacted Photographs, which could circumstantially reveal the Requestor's identity.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 December 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal and Cross Appeal / Full Bench Determination of Interlocutory Appeals
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld in part; cross-appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['industrial Relations Commission Jurisdiction' 'owner Builder Issued With Prohibition Notice' "definition of 'workplace' Under WHS Act" 'public Interest Immunity' 'production of Documents Under Notice to Produce']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal and Cross Appeal / Full Bench Determination of Interlocutory Appeals
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether owner-builder's site was a 'workplace' under the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (NSW)" 'Whether prohibition notice could be issued by inspector under s 195 of WHS Act' 'Whether documents and photographs produced under notice to produce should be redacted to protect identity of informer' 'Whether public interest immunity attaches to complaints made to SafeWork NSW']
Ratio Decidendi
As at 7 December 2020, Mr Visscher's site was properly regarded as a 'workplace' under s 8 of the WHS Act, enlivening the Commission's jurisdiction and permitting the issuance of a prohibition notice under s 195. Public interest immunity attaches to documents capable of disclosing the identity of informants, and the Commissioner erred in ordering production of unredacted Photographs, which could circumstantially reveal the Requestor's identity.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld in part; cross-appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal granted' 'Appeal upheld regarding decision to order production of Photographs without redaction' 'Decision to produce Photographs without redaction quashed' 'Appeal otherwise dismissed' 'Leave to cross-appeal granted' 'Cross-Appeal dismissed' 'Stay ordered on 20 May 2021, as extended on 10 June...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment