Transport Workers Union of Australia v Qantas Airways Ltd [2012] FCAFC 10
Section 494(5)(b) of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) empowers the Court to order monetary compensation to remedy the effects of a contravention; the words 'any other orders ... the Court considers necessary to ... remedy its effects' include compensatory orders for financial loss, not just forward-looking or injunctive relief. There is no sufficient indication in the Act's text, structure or history justifying implication of a narrower limitation. Express grants of compensation powers elsewhere do not negate or limit the breadth of s 494(5)(b) in this regard.
- Parties
- Appellant/cross Respondent: Transport Workers Union of Australia; Respondent/cross Appellant: Qantas Airways Limited (ACN 009 661 901)
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 February 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Full Court Determination on Appeal and Cross Appeal, Post Trial
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; cross-appeal adjourned pending any application for special leave to the High Court.
- Legal Topics
- Industrial Action, Monetary Compensation, Court Orders, Workplace Relations Act Construction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Transport Workers Union of Australia
Appellant/cross Respondent
Qantas Airways Limited (ACN 009 661 901)
Respondent/cross Appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Full Court Determination on Appeal and Cross Appeal, Post Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Does s 494(5)(b) of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) empower the Court to award compensation to remedy contraventions?
- 2 Whether the Court's remedial power under s 494(5)(b) is limited to ongoing effects or includes compensation for past effects
- 3 Whether express provision of compensation elsewhere in the Act excludes it under s 494
Ratio Decidendi
Section 494(5)(b) of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) empowers the Court to order monetary compensation to remedy the effects of a contravention; the words 'any other orders ... the Court considers necessary to ... remedy its effects' include compensatory orders for financial loss, not just forward-looking or injunctive relief. There is no sufficient indication in the Act's text, structure or history justifying implication of a narrower limitation. Express grants of compensation powers elsewhere do not negate or limit the breadth of s 494(5)(b) in this regard.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; cross-appeal adjourned pending any application for special leave to the High Court.
Orders
- The appeal be dismissed.
- The hearing of the cross-appeal be adjourned to a date to be fixed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment