R v Findlay; Ex parte Commonwealth Steamship Owners' Association [1953] HCA 81
The first and second alternative claims for attendance money were not necessarily outside the definition of "industrial matter". Attendance by casual wharf clerks at the place of engagement in accordance with industry custom was a regular preliminary condition of actual employment and part of the procedure by which labour was made available to employers. The extended definitions of employer and employee, and the specific reference to monetary allowances for time when an employee is not actually working, meant that the mere fact that payment related to unsuccessful attendance did not exclude the claims from the commissioner's authority. Although the third alternative claim imposing joint...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Writ of Prohibition Directed to a Conciliation Commissioner / Motion to Make Absolute an Order Nisi
- Outcome
- Order nisi for writ of prohibition discharged with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['industrial Dispute' 'industrial Matters' 'attendance Money' 'casual Wharf Clerks' 'conciliation and Arbitration' 'jurisdiction of Conciliation Commissioner' 'writ of Prohibition']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Writ of Prohibition Directed to a Conciliation Commissioner / Motion to Make Absolute an Order Nisi
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether any of the alternative claims for attendance money to casual wharf clerks related to an "industrial matter" as defined by s. 4 of the Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904-1952.' "Whether the conciliation commissioner had authority to proceed with the union's application to vary the award." 'Whether a proposed joint and several liability of all employers in a port for attendance money could lawfully be adopted.']
Ratio Decidendi
The first and second alternative claims for attendance money were not necessarily outside the definition of "industrial matter". Attendance by casual wharf clerks at the place of engagement in accordance with industry custom was a regular preliminary condition of actual employment and part of the procedure by which labour was made available to employers. The extended definitions of employer and employee, and the specific reference to monetary allowances for time when an employee is not actually working, meant that the mere fact that payment related to unsuccessful attendance did not exclude the claims from the commissioner's authority. Although the third alternative claim imposing joint...
Court Disposition
Order nisi for writ of prohibition discharged with costs.
Orders
- ['Order nisi for writ of prohibition discharged with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment