Calokerinos, Executor of the Estate of the late George Sclavos v Yesilhat; Yesilhat v Calokerinos, Executor of the Estate of the late George Sclavos [2017] NSWSC 666
The Court found that the October 2012 informal will was signed and intended by the deceased, admitted to probate, and not fabricated; that Mr Yesilhat was not in a de facto or close personal relationship with the deceased and was not an eligible person under Succession Act s 57; that all advances prior to death were loans (not gifts) given in the context of business and personal friendship, the absence of loan documentation not altering this, and that regular repayments evidenced the character as loans; and that all monies transferred by Mr Yesilhat from the deceased’s estate after death were unauthorised and fraudulent, held on constructive trust for the estate, and must be repaid.
- Parties
- Plaintiff (2013/358168); Defendant (2014/212466): Cleopatra Sclavos Calokerinos, as executor of the estate of the late George Sclavos; First Defendant (2013/358168); Plaintiff (2014/212466): Okan Yesilhat; Second Defendant (2013/358168): Gokan Yesilhat; Third Defendant (2013/358168): Australia's Best Tyres & Auto Pty Ltd ACN 151 629 131
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 June 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Principal Judgment of Consolidated Proceedings for Probate, Family Provision, and Debt Recovery / Final Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Plaintiff’s family provision and probate revocation claims dismissed. Estate’s debt/trust claims against plaintiff succeed.
- Legal Topics
- Informal Wills, Family Provision Claims, De Facto Relationships, Constructive Trusts, Fraudulent Transfers, Loan Vs Gift Characterisation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Cleopatra Sclavos Calokerinos, as executor of the estate of the late George Sclavos
Plaintiff (2013/358168); Defendant (2014/212466)
Okan Yesilhat
First Defendant (2013/358168); Plaintiff (2014/212466)
Gokan Yesilhat
Second Defendant (2013/358168)
Australia's Best Tyres & Auto Pty Ltd ACN 151 629 131
Third Defendant (2013/358168)
Procedural Posture
Principal Judgment of Consolidated Proceedings for Probate, Family Provision, and Debt Recovery / Final Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the October 2012 informal will was valid and should remain admitted to probate
- 2 Whether the plaintiff was in a de facto, dependant or close personal relationship with the deceased and entitled to claim under Succession Act 2006 (NSW) s 57
- 3 Whether monies advanced by the deceased to the plaintiff were loans or gifts
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the October 2012 informal will was signed and intended by the deceased, admitted to probate, and not fabricated; that Mr Yesilhat was not in a de facto or close personal relationship with the deceased and was not an eligible person under Succession Act s 57; that all advances prior to death were loans (not gifts) given in the context of business and personal friendship, the absence of loan documentation not altering this, and that regular repayments evidenced the character as loans; and that all monies transferred by Mr Yesilhat from the deceased’s estate after death were unauthorised and fraudulent, held on constructive trust for the estate, and must be repaid.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff’s family provision and probate revocation claims dismissed. Estate’s debt/trust claims against plaintiff succeed.
Orders
- Plaintiff’s claim for family provision out of the estate of the late George Sclavos is dismissed.
- Plaintiff’s claim to revoke the grant of probate to the defendant of the will of the late George Sclavos dated 16 October 2012 is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment