Volpes v Permanent Custodians Limited [2005] NSWSC 111
There is a serious question to be tried as to whether settlement offer correspondence is confidential in equity and whether disclosure to the litigation funder Liberty should be restrained pending determination of the stay application based on alleged abuse of process. An interlocutory injunction is warranted to restrain disclosure until further order.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 February 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Motion / Interlocutory Injunction
- Outcome
- Interlocutory injunction ordered
- Legal Topics
- ['injunctions' 'confidentiality' 'settlement Offers' 'third Party Litigation Funding' 'abuse of Process']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Motion / Interlocutory Injunction
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether correspondence marked 'without prejudice' and 'confidential – not to be disclosed to any third party' contains confidential information protected in equity" 'Whether disclosure to third-party funder should be restrained by injunction' 'Whether proceedings should be stayed as an abuse of process']
Ratio Decidendi
There is a serious question to be tried as to whether settlement offer correspondence is confidential in equity and whether disclosure to the litigation funder Liberty should be restrained pending determination of the stay application based on alleged abuse of process. An interlocutory injunction is warranted to restrain disclosure until further order.
Court Disposition
Interlocutory injunction ordered
Orders
- ['Plaintiffs restrained from disclosing contents of without prejudice offers of settlement to Liberty Finance Pty Ltd up to determination of claim in paragraph 1 of the notice of motion filed 2 December 2004 or earlier order.' 'Costs of the notice of motion to be costs in the proceedings on paragraph 1 of the notice...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment