Pasquale Lucchitti Trading as Palluc Enterprises and Ors v Tolco Pty Limited and Anor [2003] NSWSC 1070

Pasquale Lucchitti Trading as Palluc Enterprises and Ors v Tolco Pty Limited and Anor [2003] NSWSC 1070

The application for injunctive relief was refused as no serious issue to be tried was established; the adjudicator acted within jurisdiction, considered the relevant materials and duties under the Act, and any factual or legal errors did not amount to jurisdictional error. The interim nature of the Act’s scheme and the balance of convenience did not justify an injunction.

Parties
First Plaintiff: Pasquale Lucchitti Trading as Palluc Enterprises; Second Plaintiff: Ben Lucchitti Trading as Palluc Enterprises; Third Plaintiff: Paul Lucchitti Trading as Palluc Enterprises; Fourth Plaintiff: Sam Lucchitti Trading as Palluc Enterprises; Fifth Plaintiff: Irene Mavis Lucchitti Trading as Palluc Enterprises; Sixth Plaintiff: Umberto Pallone Trading as Palluc Enterprises; Seventh Plaintiff: Flora Pallone Trading as Palluc Enterprises; Eighth Plaintiff: David Alfred Pallone Trading as Palluc Enterprises; First Defendant: Tolco Pty Limited; Second Defendant: John O'Brien
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
07 November 2003
Procedural Posture
Application for Interlocutory Injunction and Declaration / Interlocutory Application, Judgment
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Injunctions, Adjudication Determinations, Jurisdictional Error, Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (nsw)
Equity Building and Construction Injunctions Adjudication Determinations Jurisdictional Error Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (nsw)

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Pasquale Lucchitti Trading as Palluc Enterprises

First Plaintiff

Ben Lucchitti Trading as Palluc Enterprises

Second Plaintiff

Paul Lucchitti Trading as Palluc Enterprises

Third Plaintiff

Sam Lucchitti Trading as Palluc Enterprises

Fourth Plaintiff

Irene Mavis Lucchitti Trading as Palluc Enterprises

Fifth Plaintiff

Umberto Pallone Trading as Palluc Enterprises

Sixth Plaintiff

Flora Pallone Trading as Palluc Enterprises

Seventh Plaintiff

David Alfred Pallone Trading as Palluc Enterprises

Eighth Plaintiff

Tolco Pty Limited

First Defendant

John O'Brien

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Application for Interlocutory Injunction and Declaration / Interlocutory Application, Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the adjudicator exceeded jurisdiction under the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW)
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to injunctive relief restraining enforcement of the adjudication determination
  3. 3 Whether there was a denial of natural justice in the adjudication process

Ratio Decidendi

The application for injunctive relief was refused as no serious issue to be tried was established; the adjudicator acted within jurisdiction, considered the relevant materials and duties under the Act, and any factual or legal errors did not amount to jurisdictional error. The interim nature of the Act’s scheme and the balance of convenience did not justify an injunction.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • Application for injunctive relief refused
  • Plaintiffs to pay the defendant’s costs of the interlocutory application