Iso Lilodw' Aliphumeleli Pty Limited (In Liq) & Anor v Commissioner of Taxation & 2 Ors [2002] NSWSC 644
Iso Lilodw' Aliphumeleli Pty Limited was insolvent at the relevant times when payments were made to the Commissioner. Directors Prentice and Getley did not have reasonable grounds to expect solvency nor did they validly rely on competent persons under s588FGB. Therefore, the Commissioner is entitled to recover the sum paid from the directors personally, plus interest.
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Iso Lilodw' Aliphumeleli Pty Limited (In Liquidation); Second Plaintiff: Steven Nicols; Cross Claimant: Commissioner of Taxation; First Cross Defendant: Peter David Prentice; Second Cross Defendant: Gordon Theodore Hothersall Getley
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 August 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Division Proceeding / Judgment After Hearing on Cross Claim
- Outcome
- Judgment for the Commissioner of Taxation against Prentice and Getley (cross-defendants)
- Legal Topics
- Insolvent Trading, Director's Liability, Recovery of Voidable Transactions, Group Tax Liabilities, Solvency Test, Defences Under Corporations Act S588 FGB
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Iso Lilodw' Aliphumeleli Pty Limited (In Liquidation)
First Plaintiff
Steven Nicols
Second Plaintiff
Commissioner of Taxation
Cross Claimant
Peter David Prentice
First Cross Defendant
Gordon Theodore Hothersall Getley
Second Cross Defendant
Procedural Posture
Equity Division Proceeding / Judgment After Hearing on Cross Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 Was Iso Lilodw' Aliphumeleli Pty Limited insolvent at the time payments were made to the Commissioner of Taxation?
- 2 Do the directors, Mr Prentice and Mr Getley, have valid defences under s588FGB of the Corporations Act against personal liability for repayment to the Commissioner of Taxation?
Ratio Decidendi
Iso Lilodw' Aliphumeleli Pty Limited was insolvent at the relevant times when payments were made to the Commissioner. Directors Prentice and Getley did not have reasonable grounds to expect solvency nor did they validly rely on competent persons under s588FGB. Therefore, the Commissioner is entitled to recover the sum paid from the directors personally, plus interest.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the Commissioner of Taxation against Prentice and Getley (cross-defendants)
Orders
- Messrs Prentice and Getley to pay $317,986.22 to the Commissioner of Taxation.
- Messrs Prentice and Getley to pay the costs of the cross claim.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment