Thompson v NSW Land and Housing Corporation (No 3) [2013] NSWSC 1658
Pestkil is entitled to interest under s 57 of the Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth) from the date it became unreasonable for Gerling to withhold payment, irrespective of whether Pestkil had paid its legal advisers or suffered out-of-pocket loss; costs of the reference are not recoverable as damages under the insurance contract and each party is to bear its own costs; applications for interest between Pestkil and the defendant are dismissed and each party bears its own costs.
- Parties
- Cross Claimant: NSW Land & Housing Corporation; Cross Defendant: ACN 005 511 062 Pty Limited (previously known as 'Pestkil'); Cross Claimant: ACN 005 511 062 Pty Limited (previously known as 'Pestkil'); 1st Cross Defendant: NSW Land & Housing Corporation; 2nd Cross Defendant: HDI-Gerling Australia Insurance Company Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 November 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Cross Claim / Post Judgment, Costs and Interest Determination
- Outcome
- Interest to Pestkil under s 57 Insurance Contracts Act until damages were paid; costs of reference not recoverable as damages; each party bears own costs of reference and costs of applications; applications for interest between Pestkil and the defendant dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Interest on Insurance Claims, Indemnity and Contribution, Costs of Reference, Damages Under Insurance Contract, Assessment of Legal Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
NSW Land & Housing Corporation
Cross Claimant
ACN 005 511 062 Pty Limited (previously known as 'Pestkil')
Cross Defendant
ACN 005 511 062 Pty Limited (previously known as 'Pestkil')
Cross Claimant
NSW Land & Housing Corporation
1st Cross Defendant
HDI-Gerling Australia Insurance Company Limited
2nd Cross Defendant
Procedural Posture
Cross Claim / Post Judgment, Costs and Interest Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Entitlement to interest under s 57 Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth)
- 2 Whether expenses incurred post-referral are recoverable as damages under the insurance contract
- 3 Characterisation of costs of reference (damages or costs)
Ratio Decidendi
Pestkil is entitled to interest under s 57 of the Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth) from the date it became unreasonable for Gerling to withhold payment, irrespective of whether Pestkil had paid its legal advisers or suffered out-of-pocket loss; costs of the reference are not recoverable as damages under the insurance contract and each party is to bear its own costs; applications for interest between Pestkil and the defendant are dismissed and each party bears its own costs.
Court Disposition
Interest to Pestkil under s 57 Insurance Contracts Act until damages were paid; costs of reference not recoverable as damages; each party bears own costs of reference and costs of applications; applications for interest between Pestkil and the defendant dismissed.
Orders
- Pestkil to bring in agreed Short Minutes of Order for calculation of interest in accordance with s 57 Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth) and r 32 Insurance Contracts Regulations; each party bears their own costs of reference; each party bears own costs in applications; applications for interest between Pestkil and...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment