Assaf v Skalkos [2000] NSWSC 935
The plaintiffs are entitled to interest at 2% per annum from the dates of publication to judgment, and indemnity costs from 17 August 1994, the date defendants walked away from settlement negotiations and were deemed to have rejected a reasonable compromise offer by the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs' result at trial was more favourable than the settlement offer, in accordance with established legal principles governing cost orders following rejection of offers of compromise.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 October 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Defamation / Post Trial Judgment on Interest and Costs
- Outcome
- Judgment for plaintiffs with interest and costs orders.
- Legal Topics
- ['interest on Verdicts' 'indemnity Costs' 'offer of Compromise' 'calderbank Letter' 'apology in Settlement' 'costs Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Defamation / Post Trial Judgment on Interest and Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether plaintiffs are entitled to interest on verdicts' 'Whether plaintiffs are entitled to indemnity costs from the date of their settlement offer' 'Effect of rejected settlement offers including requirement of apology on costs' 'Appropriate date for indemnity costs to commence']
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiffs are entitled to interest at 2% per annum from the dates of publication to judgment, and indemnity costs from 17 August 1994, the date defendants walked away from settlement negotiations and were deemed to have rejected a reasonable compromise offer by the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs' result at trial was more favourable than the settlement offer, in accordance with established legal principles governing cost orders following rejection of offers of compromise.
Court Disposition
Judgment for plaintiffs with interest and costs orders.
Orders
- ['Judgment for the first plaintiff against the defendants in the sum of $171,595.' 'Judgment for the second plaintiff against the defendants in the sum of $34,319.' "Defendants to pay plaintiffs' costs on a party and party basis to 16 August 1994, and on an indemnity basis thereafter, including costs reserved on...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment