Microsoft Corporation v Ezy Loans Pty Ltd [2003] FCA 37
The threatened website publication was not merely an accurate recitation of the litigation; on the evidence before the Court it was inaccurate and intemperate, disclosed without prejudice settlement communications, used an unread affidavit for a purpose outside the proceedings, and misrepresented the current pleadings and a refused cross-claim. Having regard to the apparent purpose of pressuring Microsoft in pending proceedings, interim restraints were justified on the usual undertaking as to damages until the Court could hear from Mr Davis.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 January 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Notice of Motion for Interim and Ex Parte Injunctive Relief in Pending Federal Court Proceedings / Interim Ex Parte Application During the Fixed Vacation
- Outcome
- Interim ex parte injunction granted in amended terms; costs reserved.
- Legal Topics
- ['interim Injunction' 'publication of Website Material About Pending Proceedings' 'without Prejudice Communications' 'unread Affidavits and Court Documents' 'legal Professional Privilege and Implied Undertaking' 'open Justice and Freedom of Speech']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion for Interim and Ex Parte Injunctive Relief in Pending Federal Court Proceedings / Interim Ex Parte Application During the Fixed Vacation
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether interim ex parte orders should restrain the respondents from publishing or communicating website material concerning the pending proceedings.' 'Whether publication of court documents, an unread affidavit and without prejudice settlement communications should be restrained.' 'Whether the threatened publication was inaccurate, intemperate or calculated to influence a party in pending civil proceedings so as to constitute contempt of court.' 'Whether the breadth of the restraint sought by the applicants should be narrowed.']
Ratio Decidendi
The threatened website publication was not merely an accurate recitation of the litigation; on the evidence before the Court it was inaccurate and intemperate, disclosed without prejudice settlement communications, used an unread affidavit for a purpose outside the proceedings, and misrepresented the current pleadings and a refused cross-claim. Having regard to the apparent purpose of pressuring Microsoft in pending proceedings, interim restraints were justified on the usual undertaking as to damages until the Court could hear from Mr Davis.
Court Disposition
Interim ex parte injunction granted in amended terms; costs reserved.
Orders
- ['Leave granted to the Applicants to file the notice of motion and supporting affidavits in court and the notice of motion made returnable instanter.' 'The hearing of the notice of motion to take place during the fixed vacation.' 'Up to and including 4 pm on 4 February 2003, the Respondents restrained from...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment