Williams v Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing Kindred Industries Union (No 3) [2009] FCA 371
The affidavit material disclosed an arguable organised program of harassment and intimidation affecting access to John Holland's project site, project office and head office, including conduct by proposed new respondents and involvement by Mr Stephenson. There was also an arguable inference that the respondent unions were associated with the activities and with attempts to defeat the intent of earlier orders. Those circumstances justified widening interim restraints, adding further respondents, and making temporary holding injunctions against unserved proposed respondents pending a further hearing.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 March 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Federal Court Interlocutory Proceedings Seeking Extension and Widening of Interim Injunctive Orders / Notices of Motion Heard on 24 March 2009; Interim Orders Made Pending Hearing and Determination or Further Order, With Further Hearing Fixed for 7 April 2009
- Outcome
- Interim injunctive relief granted and widened; additional respondents added; further hearings, affidavit timetable, mediation, directions and costs orders made.
- Legal Topics
- ['interim Injunctions' 'picketing and Alleged Harassment at Construction Project Sites' 'building and Construction Industry Improvement Act 2005 (cth)' 'joinder of Additional Respondents' 'mediation Under Federal Court Rules']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Federal Court Interlocutory Proceedings Seeking Extension and Widening of Interim Injunctive Orders / Notices of Motion Heard on 24 March 2009; Interim Orders Made Pending Hearing and Determination or Further Order, With Further Hearing Fixed for 7 April 2009
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether interim orders previously made should be extended and widened to cover further conduct at the West Gate Bridge Strengthening Alliance Project, John Holland's project office, and John Holland's Abbotsford head office." 'Whether additional persons should be added as respondents and bound by interlocutory restraints.' 'Whether there was sufficient affidavit material to justify temporary holding injunctions against proposed new respondents who had not yet been served.' 'Whether there was an arguable basis that existing respondent unions were associated with the complained-of conduct and attempts to defeat the intent of existing orders.']
Ratio Decidendi
The affidavit material disclosed an arguable organised program of harassment and intimidation affecting access to John Holland's project site, project office and head office, including conduct by proposed new respondents and involvement by Mr Stephenson. There was also an arguable inference that the respondent unions were associated with the activities and with attempts to defeat the intent of earlier orders. Those circumstances justified widening interim restraints, adding further respondents, and making temporary holding injunctions against unserved proposed respondents pending a further hearing.
Court Disposition
Interim injunctive relief granted and widened; additional respondents added; further hearings, affidavit timetable, mediation, directions and costs orders made.
Orders
- ["In VID 83 of 2009, the first, second, third and fourth respondents were restrained until hearing and determination or further order from hindering supply of goods or services to the West Gate Bridge Strengthening Alliance Project, counselling persons not to supply, deliver or work, impeding access to John...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment