O’Keefe v Integral Corporate Property Pty Limited [2021] NSWSC 46

O’Keefe v Integral Corporate Property Pty Limited [2021] NSWSC 46

The Court held that an injunction to preserve the specific property (the Glebe property) was justified pending determination of the plaintiff's proprietary claim, but there was insufficient evidence to justify an extended freezing (asset preservation) order as there was no demonstrated risk of dissipation. The application for broader interlocutory relief and disclosure was therefore refused.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
04 February 2021
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Interim Orders – Continuation and Consideration of Interlocutory Injunction/freezing Orders
Outcome
Injunction to preserve Glebe property granted; other interlocutory relief dismissed; costs in the cause; proceedings listed for directions.
Legal Topics
['interim Preservation' 'freezing Orders' 'injunctions' 'trusts' 'assignment of Cause of Action']
['equity' 'civil Procedure'] ['interim Preservation' 'freezing Orders' 'injunctions' 'trusts' 'assignment of Cause of Action']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Interlocutory Application / Interim Orders – Continuation and Consideration of Interlocutory Injunction/freezing Orders

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the plaintiff is entitled to continuation of freezing orders' 'Whether an injunction to preserve the Glebe property pending trial should be granted' 'Whether the plaintiff has standing via assignment of cause of action' 'Whether disclosure and extended asset preservation orders should be made']

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that an injunction to preserve the specific property (the Glebe property) was justified pending determination of the plaintiff's proprietary claim, but there was insufficient evidence to justify an extended freezing (asset preservation) order as there was no demonstrated risk of dissipation. The application for broader interlocutory relief and disclosure was therefore refused.

Court Disposition

Injunction to preserve Glebe property granted; other interlocutory relief dismissed; costs in the cause; proceedings listed for directions.

Orders

  • ['Upon the plaintiff giving the usual undertaking as to damages, the first defendant is restrained until further order from dealing with, disposing of or further encumbering the property known as [XX] Forsyth Street, Glebe, except the first defendant may let the property on ordinary commercial terms for the period...