Brylewski v Maclean [2023] NSWSC 876
The application for interim stay is dismissed because the defendants' rights to the property were already determined in previous exhaustive litigation, the Registrar properly applied the slip rule to correct an order, and the evidence of hardship was insufficient to warrant a stay.
- Parties
- First Plaintiff/first Respondent: Maria Brylewski; Second Plaintiff/second Respondent: Tadeusz Brylewski; First Defendant/first Applicant: Jacqueline Maclean; Second Defendant/second Applicant: David Raynor; Third Defendant/third Applicant: Emil Radecki
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 July 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Procedure – Application for Interim Stay / Interlocutory Application, Ex Tempore Decision
- Outcome
- Application (amended notice of motion) dismissed. Costs ordered against the applicant.
- Legal Topics
- Interim Stay, Writ of Possession, Slip Rule, Probate Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Maria Brylewski
First Plaintiff/first Respondent
Tadeusz Brylewski
Second Plaintiff/second Respondent
Jacqueline Maclean
First Defendant/first Applicant
David Raynor
Second Defendant/second Applicant
Emil Radecki
Third Defendant/third Applicant
Procedural Posture
Civil Procedure – Application for Interim Stay / Interlocutory Application, Ex Tempore Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether interim stay of writ of possession should be granted
- 2 Whether Registrar's correction of order under the slip rule was valid
- 3 Whether execution of writ would occasion hardship warranting a stay
Ratio Decidendi
The application for interim stay is dismissed because the defendants' rights to the property were already determined in previous exhaustive litigation, the Registrar properly applied the slip rule to correct an order, and the evidence of hardship was insufficient to warrant a stay.
Court Disposition
Application (amended notice of motion) dismissed. Costs ordered against the applicant.
Orders
- The amended notice of motion is dismissed.
- The applicant to pay the respondent's costs of today's proceedings.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment