Incentive Dynamics Pty Ltd (in liquidation) & Anor v Robins, Douglas Robert McNeill & Ors [1998] FCA 909
As there are alternative sources of funds available to the respondents for litigation, and given the strong prima facie position of the applicants concerning some properties, the application by respondents to be released from undertakings is dismissed.
- Parties
- First Applicant: Incentive Dynamics Pty Limited (In Liquidation) (ACN 003 294 700); Second Applicant: Robert William Morton (Official Liquidator of Incentive Dynamics Pty Limited); First Respondent: Douglas Robert McNeill Robins; Second Respondent: John Haigh Robins; Third Respondent: Jonathan Michael Meissner; Fourth Respondent: John D'ersby Hudson; Fifth Respondent: Coldwick Pty Limited (ACN 053 673 395); Sixth Respondent: Robins Haigh McNeill Pty Limited (ACN 002 876 771); Seventh Respondent: Pagby Pty Limited (ACN 005 203 136); Eighth Respondent: Cheryl Ann Chang
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 May 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Application in Proceeding / Ex Tempore Decision on Application to Be Released From Court Undertakings
- Outcome
- Respondents' application dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Interlocutory Applications, Release From Undertakings, Asset Protection
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Incentive Dynamics Pty Limited (In Liquidation) (ACN 003 294 700)
First Applicant
Robert William Morton (Official Liquidator of Incentive Dynamics Pty Limited)
Second Applicant
Douglas Robert McNeill Robins
First Respondent
John Haigh Robins
Second Respondent
Jonathan Michael Meissner
Third Respondent
John D'ersby Hudson
Fourth Respondent
Coldwick Pty Limited (ACN 053 673 395)
Fifth Respondent
Robins Haigh McNeill Pty Limited (ACN 002 876 771)
Sixth Respondent
Pagby Pty Limited (ACN 005 203 136)
Seventh Respondent
Cheryl Ann Chang
Eighth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application in Proceeding / Ex Tempore Decision on Application to Be Released From Court Undertakings
Legal Issues
- 1 Should the respondents be released from undertakings to the Court regarding certain properties?
- 2 Are there alternative funding sources available other than assets subject to undertakings?
Ratio Decidendi
As there are alternative sources of funds available to the respondents for litigation, and given the strong prima facie position of the applicants concerning some properties, the application by respondents to be released from undertakings is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Respondents' application dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The respondents' application is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment