Speiser v Locums Financial Management Pty Ltd [1996] IRCA 397
The applicant failed to establish a sufficient risk that the respondents would dissipate assets to frustrate any judgment; undertakings offered by respondents and the circumstances did not warrant a Mareva-type injunction; no trust arose over claimed commissions, only a debtor/creditor relationship.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 February 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Application for Interlocutory (mareva Type) Injunction
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['interlocutory Injunctions' 'termination of Employment' 'mareva Injunctions' 'unpaid Commissions']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Application for Interlocutory (mareva Type) Injunction
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether a Mareva-type injunction is available to secure alleged unpaid commissions' 'Whether the respondents are at risk of dissipating assets to frustrate any judgment']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant failed to establish a sufficient risk that the respondents would dissipate assets to frustrate any judgment; undertakings offered by respondents and the circumstances did not warrant a Mareva-type injunction; no trust arose over claimed commissions, only a debtor/creditor relationship.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- ['The notice of motion be dismissed.' 'Time extended until 19 February for applicant to file any affidavits previously ordered to be filed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment