Edwards v Edwards [2013] NSWDC 56

Edwards v Edwards [2013] NSWDC 56

The cross-claim was struck out due to extensive pleading defects, lack of reasonable cause of action in several claims (including misapplication of torts of malicious prosecution and abuse of process to non-criminal/ADVO proceedings), and failure to particularise claims for negligence and misrepresentation. The Court held that claims for malicious prosecution generally do not lie for non-criminal matters but, given conflicting authorities, allowed the defendant/cross-claimant liberty to replead. Applications for summary dismissal/summary judgment were rejected as there were material factual disputes to be determined at hearing.

Parties
Plaintiff/first Cross Defendant: Elaine Jann Edwards; Defendant/cross Claimant: Russell William Edwards; Second Cross Defendant: Frances Smith
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
06 May 2013
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Ruling on Notices of Motion Regarding Summary Dismissal and Strike Out of Pleadings
Outcome
Cross-claim struck out with leave to replead; defendant/cross-claimant's Notices of Motion struck out and dismissed; costs awarded to plaintiff/cross-defendants.
Legal Topics
Interlocutory Applications, Summary Dismissal, Strike Out of Pleadings, Abuse of Process, Malicious Prosecution, Uncollected Goods
Civil Procedure Interlocutory Applications Summary Dismissal Strike Out of Pleadings Abuse of Process Malicious Prosecution Uncollected Goods

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 24 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Elaine Jann Edwards

Plaintiff/first Cross Defendant

Russell William Edwards

Defendant/cross Claimant

Frances Smith

Second Cross Defendant

Procedural Posture

Interlocutory Application / Ruling on Notices of Motion Regarding Summary Dismissal and Strike Out of Pleadings

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether defendant/cross-claimant's cross-claim should be struck out for failure to disclose a reasonable cause of action or for pleading deficiencies
  2. 2 Whether claims for abuse of process and malicious prosecution in relation to non-criminal proceedings are maintainable
  3. 3 Whether plaintiff's claims for disposal of goods and charges under the Uncollected Goods Act 1995 (NSW) can be summarily dismissed

Ratio Decidendi

The cross-claim was struck out due to extensive pleading defects, lack of reasonable cause of action in several claims (including misapplication of torts of malicious prosecution and abuse of process to non-criminal/ADVO proceedings), and failure to particularise claims for negligence and misrepresentation. The Court held that claims for malicious prosecution generally do not lie for non-criminal matters but, given conflicting authorities, allowed the defendant/cross-claimant liberty to replead. Applications for summary dismissal/summary judgment were rejected as there were material factual disputes to be determined at hearing.

Court Disposition

Cross-claim struck out with leave to replead; defendant/cross-claimant's Notices of Motion struck out and dismissed; costs awarded to plaintiff/cross-defendants.

Orders

  • The defendant/cross-claimant's Notices of Motion of 10 and 30 April 2013 struck out and dismissed.
  • Plaintiff/cross-defendants' Notice of Motion of 5 April 2013 granted; cross-claim struck out, with leave to the defendant/cross-claimant to file and serve the amended cross-claim in 21 days (27 May 2013).