United Motor Search Pty Ltd v Hanson Construction Materials Pty Ltd (No 2) [2014] FCA 277
The interlocutory order made on 24 October 2013 is no longer sustainable because key customers have banned Mr Meredith, making it impracticable for Hanson to comply with its usual rostering arrangements, with risk of commercial prejudice to Hanson and other drivers. The changed circumstances, caused by Mr Meredith's conduct, have shifted the balance of convenience against continuation of the order; therefore, the order should be vacated, although a serious question to be tried remains.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 March 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Application to Vacate Interlocutory Order
- Outcome
- Order 1 of the orders of 24 October 2013 vacated; interlocutory injunction discharged.
- Legal Topics
- ['interlocutory Relief' 'balance of Convenience' 'workplace Safety' 'fair Work Act' 'vacation of Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Application to Vacate Interlocutory Order
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the interlocutory order of 24 October 2013 should be vacated' 'Whether the balance of convenience has shifted since the original order' 'Whether it is possible for the respondents to comply with the original order' 'Whether there is still a serious question to be tried']
Ratio Decidendi
The interlocutory order made on 24 October 2013 is no longer sustainable because key customers have banned Mr Meredith, making it impracticable for Hanson to comply with its usual rostering arrangements, with risk of commercial prejudice to Hanson and other drivers. The changed circumstances, caused by Mr Meredith's conduct, have shifted the balance of convenience against continuation of the order; therefore, the order should be vacated, although a serious question to be tried remains.
Court Disposition
Order 1 of the orders of 24 October 2013 vacated; interlocutory injunction discharged.
Orders
- ['Order 1 of 24 October 2013 be vacated.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment