Campara v Australian Islamic Society of Bosnia Herzegovina Inc [2020] NSWSC 1739
The resolutions purporting to remove the plaintiffs from committee or association membership and to appoint replacements were invalid because they were made without proper power under the constitution, lacked required procedural fairness, adequate notice, or quorum, and did not comply with the constitutional provisions regarding removal and appointment. Procedural irregularities were not validated under s 1322 of the Corporations Act given the substantial injustice caused. Declaratory relief was appropriate. As the proceedings were resolved by consent and both parties acted reasonably, there was no order as to costs.
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Amir Campara; Second Plaintiff: Hasan Alijagic; Third Plaintiff: Hasan Garibovic; Fourth Plaintiff: Enver Hot; Fifth Plaintiff: Admir Mutapcic; First Defendant: Australian Islamic Society of Bosnia Herzegovina Inc; Second Defendant: Jasmin Bekric; Third Defendant: Asim Begic; Fourth Defendant: Aldin Becic; Fifth Defendant: Albin Hasanovic; Sixth Defendant: Semir Korjenic; Seventh Defendant: Semir Islamovic; Eighth Defendant: Dzvedet Alic; Ninth Defendant: Zijad Haracic; Tenth Defendant: Huska Kazic; Eleventh Defendant: Novalija Hodzic
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 December 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Corporations List / Principal Judgment
- Outcome
- Declarations and orders made by consent; no order as to costs
- Legal Topics
- Internal Management of Incorporated Associations, Meetings and Resolutions, Contractual Enforcement of Constitutions, Procedural Fairness, Validity of Appointments and Removals
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Amir Campara
First Plaintiff
Hasan Alijagic
Second Plaintiff
Hasan Garibovic
Third Plaintiff
Enver Hot
Fourth Plaintiff
Admir Mutapcic
Fifth Plaintiff
Australian Islamic Society of Bosnia Herzegovina Inc
First Defendant
Jasmin Bekric
Second Defendant
Asim Begic
Third Defendant
Aldin Becic
Fourth Defendant
Albin Hasanovic
Fifth Defendant
Semir Korjenic
Sixth Defendant
Semir Islamovic
Seventh Defendant
Dzvedet Alic
Eighth Defendant
Zijad Haracic
Ninth Defendant
Huska Kazic
Tenth Defendant
Novalija Hodzic
Eleventh Defendant
Procedural Posture
Equity Corporations List / Principal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether committee resolutions removing plaintiffs and appointing others were invalid for breach of the constitution
- 2 Whether expulsions and appointments were in accordance with the constitution and procedural fairness
- 3 Whether the requirements for disciplinary proceedings and notice were met
Ratio Decidendi
The resolutions purporting to remove the plaintiffs from committee or association membership and to appoint replacements were invalid because they were made without proper power under the constitution, lacked required procedural fairness, adequate notice, or quorum, and did not comply with the constitutional provisions regarding removal and appointment. Procedural irregularities were not validated under s 1322 of the Corporations Act given the substantial injustice caused. Declaratory relief was appropriate. As the proceedings were resolved by consent and both parties acted reasonably, there was no order as to costs.
Court Disposition
Declarations and orders made by consent; no order as to costs
Orders
- Declares the displacement of the second plaintiff from the Committee on or around 11 March 2020 was invalid.
- Declares the displacement of the second plaintiff from the Association on or around 1 October 2020 was invalid.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment