Master Builders Association of Victoria v. The Australian Buildings Construction Employees & Builders Labourers Federation [1981] FCA 58
Provision of a vehicle by the employer to an employee, free of charge, is 'provision of transport' within clause 16.6 even when the employee is required to drive it from home to work and return pursuant to his contract of employment. Further, time spent driving such a vehicle in those circumstances is considered 'working time' under clauses 17 and 19 of the Award.
- Parties
- Appellant (respondent): Master Builders Association of Victoria; Respondent (applicant): Australian Building Construction Employees and Builders Labourers Federation
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 May 1981
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal as of Right, Application for Interpretation of Award Under S.110, Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904 / Full Court Decision After Hearing, Judgment Delivered
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed. Interpretation set aside. New interpretation given.
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of Award, Travel Time as Working Time, Provision of Transport, Jurisdiction and Powers of the Court
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Master Builders Association of Victoria
Appellant (respondent)
Australian Building Construction Employees and Builders Labourers Federation
Respondent (applicant)
Procedural Posture
Appeal as of Right, Application for Interpretation of Award Under S.110, Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904 / Full Court Decision After Hearing, Judgment Delivered
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether provision of a vehicle by the employer, free of charge, constitutes 'provision of transport' under clause 16.6 of the Building Construction Employees and Builders Labourers Award 1978 when the employee is required to drive from home to work and return
- 2 Whether the time spent driving such vehicle is 'working time' within the meaning of clauses 17 and 19
Ratio Decidendi
Provision of a vehicle by the employer to an employee, free of charge, is 'provision of transport' within clause 16.6 even when the employee is required to drive it from home to work and return pursuant to his contract of employment. Further, time spent driving such a vehicle in those circumstances is considered 'working time' under clauses 17 and 19 of the Award.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed. Interpretation set aside. New interpretation given.
Orders
- Appeal allowed and interpretation set aside.
- Interpretation of clause 16.6: provision of a vehicle by the employer to an employee free of charge is provision of transport when the employee is required, pursuant to his contract, to drive from home to work and return.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment