In the matter of Synergy Medical Imaging Pty Ltd [2021] NSWSC 579
The Terms of Settlement did not entitle Clarity to ownership of software licences which it did not own at settlement; implied obligations of good faith and cooperation applied only to the extent necessary to give efficacy to the agreement but not to dealings beyond performance of specific terms; s 73 Civil Procedure Act did not empower the Court to impose indemnities or vary settlement terms; Clarity established entitlement to telephone and facsimile numbers but not to disputed software licences.
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: VC Investments Pty Ltd (ACN 161 700 974); Second Plaintiff: Virgil Chan; Sixth Defendant: Tomjo Nominees Pty Ltd (ACN 161 754 196); Seventh Defendant: Thomas MacDougall; Eighth Defendant: Devpri Pty Ltd (ACN 161 772 710); Ninth Defendant: Ajay Thakorlal; Tenth Defendant: Gularbre Pty Ltd (ACN 161 983 035); Eleventh Defendant: Shane Gavin Fernando; Twelfth Defendant: L Gibbs Enterprises Pty Ltd (ACN 600 426 248); Thirteenth Defendant: Leesa Gibbs
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 May 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Corporations List / Interlocutory Application in Substantive Winding Up Proceedings
- Outcome
- Declaratory relief partially granted; interlocutory process otherwise dismissed; parties to file costs submissions.
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of Settlement Terms, Implied Terms (good Faith and Cooperation), Declaratory Relief, Scope of Court's Power Under Civil Procedure Act 2005 (nsw) S 73
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
VC Investments Pty Ltd (ACN 161 700 974)
First Plaintiff
Virgil Chan
Second Plaintiff
Tomjo Nominees Pty Ltd (ACN 161 754 196)
Sixth Defendant
Thomas MacDougall
Seventh Defendant
Devpri Pty Ltd (ACN 161 772 710)
Eighth Defendant
Ajay Thakorlal
Ninth Defendant
Gularbre Pty Ltd (ACN 161 983 035)
Tenth Defendant
Shane Gavin Fernando
Eleventh Defendant
L Gibbs Enterprises Pty Ltd (ACN 600 426 248)
Twelfth Defendant
Leesa Gibbs
Thirteenth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Equity Corporations List / Interlocutory Application in Substantive Winding Up Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Terms of Settlement entitled Clarity to retain ownership of certain property or rights after settlement
- 2 Whether the Terms of Settlement contained implied terms of good faith and cooperation
- 3 Whether the Court had power under Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) s 73 to order indemnities not provided for in Terms of Settlement
Ratio Decidendi
The Terms of Settlement did not entitle Clarity to ownership of software licences which it did not own at settlement; implied obligations of good faith and cooperation applied only to the extent necessary to give efficacy to the agreement but not to dealings beyond performance of specific terms; s 73 Civil Procedure Act did not empower the Court to impose indemnities or vary settlement terms; Clarity established entitlement to telephone and facsimile numbers but not to disputed software licences.
Court Disposition
Declaratory relief partially granted; interlocutory process otherwise dismissed; parties to file costs submissions.
Orders
- Declared: Clarity entitled to retain telephone number 02 4990 2655 and facsimile number 02 4990 2522 under Terms of Settlement.
- Interlocutory process otherwise dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment