Moggridge v The Benevolent Society [2016] NSWSC 850
Because the defendant's own records recorded the plaintiff's short-term memory problems and some matters concerning the plaintiff's care and the circumstances of the fall were peculiarly or appropriately within the defendant's knowledge, special reasons and necessity were established for interrogatories directed to facts in issue. Interrogatories seeking facts already known to the plaintiff, identification of witnesses, conclusions, written briefings, or hypothetical engineering-type matters were not allowed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 June 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury Claim for Damages Arising Out of Bodily Injury / Application for the Issue of Interrogatories
- Outcome
- Application for service of interrogatories allowed in part.
- Legal Topics
- ['interrogatories' 'special Reasons' 'necessity' 'short Term Memory Loss' 'civil Procedure']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Claim for Damages Arising Out of Bodily Injury / Application for the Issue of Interrogatories
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Court should allow service of interrogatories in a personal injury proceeding.' 'Whether special reasons existed to justify interrogatories under rule 22.1 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW).' 'Whether the proposed interrogatories were necessary and directed to facts in issue rather than discovery of evidence, identification of witnesses, conclusions, or hypothetical matters.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the defendant's own records recorded the plaintiff's short-term memory problems and some matters concerning the plaintiff's care and the circumstances of the fall were peculiarly or appropriately within the defendant's knowledge, special reasons and necessity were established for interrogatories directed to facts in issue. Interrogatories seeking facts already known to the plaintiff, identification of witnesses, conclusions, written briefings, or hypothetical engineering-type matters were not allowed.
Court Disposition
Application for service of interrogatories allowed in part.
Orders
- ['Allow service of interrogatories 2, 4(c), 5 if confined to oral briefings, 6(a), 7, 9, 10(b), 10(c) and 11.' 'Costs be costs in the cause.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment