Aspar Autobarn Co-Op Society & Ors v. Dovala Pty Ltd & Ors [1987] FCA 291
The applicants' interrogatories in question were relevant, appropriately framed, and not oppressive or vexatious within the meaning of Federal Court Rules Ord.16 r.9. Objections made on other grounds were not available, and the respondents were required to provide further and better answers accordingly.
- Parties
- Applicants: Aspar Autobarn Co-operative Society and Others; Respondents: Dovala Pty Ltd and Others
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 June 1987
- Procedural Posture
- Notice of Motion (interlocutory) / Ruling on Objections to Interrogatories
- Outcome
- Notice of motion granted in favour of the applicants.
- Legal Topics
- Interrogatories, Objections, Practice and Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Aspar Autobarn Co-operative Society and Others
Applicants
Dovala Pty Ltd and Others
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion (interlocutory) / Ruling on Objections to Interrogatories
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether respondents' objections to specific interrogatories were valid under Federal Court Rules Ord.16 r.9
- 2 Interpretation of 'vexatious' and 'oppressive' as grounds for objection to interrogatories
Ratio Decidendi
The applicants' interrogatories in question were relevant, appropriately framed, and not oppressive or vexatious within the meaning of Federal Court Rules Ord.16 r.9. Objections made on other grounds were not available, and the respondents were required to provide further and better answers accordingly.
Court Disposition
Notice of motion granted in favour of the applicants.
Orders
- Within 21 days the second, third and fourth respondents file and serve further and better answers to interrogatories numbered 18 to 25 inclusive, and 27, as specified in the applicants' notice dated 4 February 1987.
- The second, third and fourth respondents pay the applicants' taxed costs of this notice of motion.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment