Murex Diagnostics Australia Pty Ltd Chiron Corporation & Ors [1996] FCA 162
The evidence was sufficient to allow joinder and, although close to the borderline, sufficient to establish a prima facie case for service out of the jurisdiction; Mr Kerr should have the opportunity to seek to make the case, subject to amending the statement of claim as indicated in argument.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 March 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Notice of Motion for Joinder and Service Out of the Jurisdiction / Reasons for Judgment on Notice of Motion
- Outcome
- Notice of motion granted
- Legal Topics
- ['joinder of Parties' 'service Out of the Jurisdiction' 'prima Facie Case']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion for Joinder and Service Out of the Jurisdiction / Reasons for Judgment on Notice of Motion
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the parent company should be joined on the basis of evidence suggesting it may have authorised breaches alleged against the Murex companies already parties.' 'Whether there was a sufficient prima facie case for service out of the jurisdiction.']
Ratio Decidendi
The evidence was sufficient to allow joinder and, although close to the borderline, sufficient to establish a prima facie case for service out of the jurisdiction; Mr Kerr should have the opportunity to seek to make the case, subject to amending the statement of claim as indicated in argument.
Court Disposition
Notice of motion granted
Orders
- ['Order made on the footing that Mr Kerr will amend the statement of claim in the manner indicated in the course of argument.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment