Club of the Clubs Pty Limited v King Network Group Pty Limited (No 2) [2007] NSWSC 574
COTC was not precluded from making a split election as between different defendants. COTC could seek equitable compensation from KNG, Stamoulis and S Stamoulis and an account of profits from KDG. The $4 million guarantee was only interim security and a contingent liability that was never called on, not a capital contribution, so equitable compensation was not increased by $600,000. KDG's participation in and profits from the Macquarie Bank Joint Venture were obtained as a direct result of KNG's breach of fiduciary duty, but COTC's entitlement was limited to its 15% share in the original joint venture, resulting in an account of profits of $2,146,637.22.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 July 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Division Commercial List Proceedings Concerning Joint Venture, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Breach of Contract and Accessorial Liability / Determination of Remedies Following Liability Judgment Delivered on 9 November 2006
- Outcome
- COTC was entitled to equitable compensation and damages against KNG, Stamoulis and S Stamoulis in the amount of $631,123.91 plus interest, and to an account of profits against KDG in the amount of $2,146,637.22 plus interest, subject to no recovery of the equitable compensation and damages amounts beyond the account...
- Legal Topics
- ['joint Venture' 'fiduciary Duty' 'breach of Fiduciary Duty' 'accessorial Liability' 'equitable Compensation' 'account of Profits' 'election Between Remedies' 'inducing Breach of Contract' 'indemnity']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Equity Division Commercial List Proceedings Concerning Joint Venture, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Breach of Contract and Accessorial Liability / Determination of Remedies Following Liability Judgment Delivered on 9 November 2006
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether COTC was entitled to make a split election by seeking equitable compensation against KNG, Stamoulis and S Stamoulis while seeking an account of profits against KDG.' 'Whether the award of equitable compensation should be increased by $600,000 by treating the $4 million guarantee as a capital contribution by KNG.' 'Whether KDG, as an accessory, was required to disgorge profits made from the Macquarie Bank Joint Venture.' "Whether COTC's entitlement to KDG's profits was limited to its 15% interest in the original joint venture."]
Ratio Decidendi
COTC was not precluded from making a split election as between different defendants. COTC could seek equitable compensation from KNG, Stamoulis and S Stamoulis and an account of profits from KDG. The $4 million guarantee was only interim security and a contingent liability that was never called on, not a capital contribution, so equitable compensation was not increased by $600,000. KDG's participation in and profits from the Macquarie Bank Joint Venture were obtained as a direct result of KNG's breach of fiduciary duty, but COTC's entitlement was limited to its 15% share in the original joint venture, resulting in an account of profits of $2,146,637.22.
Court Disposition
COTC was entitled to equitable compensation and damages against KNG, Stamoulis and S Stamoulis in the amount of $631,123.91 plus interest, and to an account of profits against KDG in the amount of $2,146,637.22 plus interest, subject to no recovery of the equitable compensation and damages amounts beyond the account...
Orders
- ['COTC is entitled to an order against KDG in the amount of $2,146,637.22 plus interest.' 'COTC is entitled to an order against KNG, Stamoulis and S Stamoulis for payment of equitable compensation and damages in the contract claims in the amount of $631,123.91 plus interest.' 'COTC is not entitled to recover the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment